THE INFLUENCE OF FORENSIC ECONOMIC EXPERTISE ON THE CHANGE OF THE AUDIT PARADIGM OF FRAUD ASSESSMENT

Keywords: audit, auditing standards, forensic economic examination, fraud, fraud assessment tools

Abstract

The study is focused on substantiating the theoretical and practical possibilities of enhancing fraud detection through the use of analytical tools of forensic economic examination by auditors within the framework of cooperation on creating a legislative basis for such cooperation by regulatory and standard-setting bodies. The genesis of development and ways to improve the theoretical and applied areas of forensic economic expertise in the field of fraud research during pre-trial investigation and trial of economic crimes are considered. The scientific positions of individual scientists and representatives of foreign scientific schools on issues of the concept of fraud research methods in auditing are summarized. The organizational approaches implemented in the domestic practice of combating fraud through the construction of internal control systems, internal audit and the work of audit committees are analyzed. The tasks of external audit and internal audit are distinguished, which determine the roles of audit in the process of fraud investigation. It has been established that in the modern economic environment, the auditor's tool for detecting fraud through the fraud triangle needs to be improved by providing auditors with the skills of using forensic examination tools. In order to realize the purpose of the research, a survey toolkit of three professional groups of specialists in the fields of forensic economic examination, internal audit, audit and scientists was developed. According to the results of the survey, it was established that the adaptation of fraud analysis methods and tools performed by forensic economic experts during pre-trial investigation and trial of criminal offenses is expedient in the work of auditors. The results of the survey proved the importance of strengthening training programs for auditors with issues of introducing fraud detection skills possessed by forensic economic experts. The practical consequences of the conducted research consist in increasing the awareness of auditors regarding the importance of acquiring basic skills of forensic economic examination, which will increase the probability of detecting fraud.

References

ACFE's (2012) Report to the nations on occupational fraud and abuse. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. 74 р.

Rushe, D. (2012) HSBC ‘sorry’ for aiding Mexican drugs lords. Rogue states and terrorists. The Guardian, Tuesday, July 17, 2012. Retrieved from: http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2012/jul/17/hsbc-executive-resigns-senate. (дата звернення: 01.08.2023)

Гуцаленко Л. В., Попик Т. О. Помилки та шахрайства в аудиторській практиці. Ефективна економіка. 2017. № 3. URL: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=5470 (дата звернення: 01.08.2023)

Царенко О. В. Кармазін В. А. Об’єкти локалізації зусиль під час розробки та виконання аудиторських процедур як система послідовних дій аудитора для запобігання ризику шахрайства. Ефективна економіка. 2022. № 9. DOI: http://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2105.2022.9.17

Міжнародні стандарти контролю якості, аудиту, огляду, іншого надання впевненості та супутніх послуг, видання 2016-2017. Міжнародна Федерація Бухгалтерів, Аудиторська Палата України. URL: http://www.apu.com.ua/files/temp/Audit_2018_1.pdf (дата звернення: 01.08.2023)

Albrecht, W., Albrecht, C., Albrecht, C. and Zimbelman, M. (2008) Fraud Examination, Cengage Learning, Boston.

Beasley, M. (1996) An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. The Accounting Review, Vol. 71, pp. 443–465.

Bierstaker, J. L., Brody, R. G. and Pacini, C. (2006) Accountants’ perceptions regarding fraud detection and prevention methods. Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 21 No. 5, pp. 520–535.

Boritz, J.E., Kotchetova, N. and Robinson, L. A. (2008) Planning fraud detection procedures: forensic accountants vs auditors. IFA Conference

Buckhoff, T. A., & Schrader, R. W. (2000) The teaching of forensic accounting. Journal of Forensic Accounting, vol. 1(1), pp. 135–146.

Rezaee, Z. (2002) Forensic accounting practices, education, and certifications. Journal of Forensic Accounting, vol. 3 no. 2, pp. 207–223.

Rezaee, Z. (2004) Restoring public trust in the accounting profession by developing anti-fraud education, programs, and auditing. Managerial Auditing Journal, vol. 19 no. 1, pp. 134–148.

Лубенченко О. Е., Василюк М. М. Організаційні засади аудиту фінансової звітності в Україні. Статистика України. 2019. № 2. С. 92–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31767/su.2(85)2019.02.10

Давидов Г. М. Аудит: теорія і практика : монографія. Кіровоград : ТОВ «Імекс-ЛТД». 2006. 324 с.

Шалімова Н. С. Соціально-економічні аспекти аудиту: теорія і практика : монографія. Кіровоград : ТОВ «ІмексЛТД», 2012. 672 с.

Lastanti, H. S., Murwaningsari, E., & Umar, H. (2022). The Effect of Hexagon Fraud on Fraud Financial Statements with Governance and Culture as Moderating Variables. Jurnal Media Riset Akuntansi, Auditing & Informasi, 22(1), 143–156.

AICPA (2002). Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit, Statement on Auditing Standards No. 99, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, New York, NY.

ACFE's (2012) Report to the nations on occupational fraud and abuse. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. 74 р.

Rushe, D. (2012) HSBC ‘sorry’ for aiding Mexican drugs lords. Rogue states and terrorists. The Guardian, Tuesday, July 17, 2012. Available at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2012/jul/17/hsbc-executive-resigns-senate. (accessed August 01, 2023)

Hutsalenko L. V., Popyk T. O. (2017) Pomylky ta shakhraistva v audytorskii praktytsi. [Errors and fraud in auditing practice]. Efektyvna ekonomika, vol. 3. Available at: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=5470 (accessed August 01, 2023)

Tsarenko O. V., Karmazin V.A. (2022) Obiekty lokalizatsii zusyl pid chas rozrobky ta vykonannia audytorskykh protsedur yak systema poslidovnykh dii audytora dlia zapobihannia ryzyku shakhraistva [Objects of localization of efforts during the development and execution of audit procedures as a system of consistent actions of the auditor to prevent the risk of fraud]. Efektyvna ekonomika, vol. 9. DOI: http://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2105.2022.9.17

Mizhnarodni standarty kontroliu yakosti, audytu, ohliadu, inshoho nadannia vpevnenosti ta suputnikh posluh, vydannia 2016-2017 [International standards for quality control, auditing, review, other assurance and related services, edition 2016-2017]. Mizhnarodna Federatsiia Bukhhalteriv, Audytorska Palata Ukrainy. Available at: http://www.apu.com.ua/files/temp/Audit_2018_1.pdf (accessed August 01, 2023)

Albrecht, W., Albrecht, C., Albrecht, C. and Zimbelman, M. (2008) Fraud Examination, Cengage Learning, Boston.

Beasley, M. (1996) An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. The Accounting Review, vol. 71, pp. 443–465.

Bierstaker, J. L., Brody, R. G. and Pacini, C. (2006) Accountants’ perceptions regarding fraud detection and prevention methods. Managerial Auditing Journal, vol. 21 no. 5, pp. 520–535.

Boritz, J. E., Kotchetova, N. and Robinson, L. A. (2008) Planning fraud detection procedures: forensic accountants vs auditors. IFA Conference.

Buckhoff, T. A., & Schrader, R. W. (2000) The teaching of forensic accounting. Journal of Forensic Accounting, vol. 1(1), pp. 135–146.

Rezaee, Z. (2002) Forensic accounting practices, education, and certifications. Journal of Forensic Accounting, vol. 3 no. 2, pp. 207–223.

Rezaee, Z. (2004) Restoring public trust in the accounting profession by developing anti-fraud education, programs, and auditing. Managerial Auditing Journal, vol. 19 no. 1, pp. 134–148.

Lubenchenko O. E., Vasyliuk M. M. (2019) Orhanizatsiini zasady audytu finansovoi zvitnosti v Ukraini. [Organizational principles of financial reporting audit in Ukraine]. Statystyka Ukrainy, vol. 2, рр. 92–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31767/su.2(85)2019.02.10

Davydov H. M. (2006) Audyt: teoriia i praktyka: monohrafiia [Audit: theory and practice: monograph]. Kirovohrad: TOV «Imeks-LTD». (in Ukrainian)

Shalimova N. S. (2012) Sotsialno-ekonomichni aspekty audytu: teoriia i praktyka: monohrafiia [Socio-economic aspects of auditing: theory and practice: monograph]. Kirovohrad: TOV «ImeksLTD». (in Ukrainian)

Lastanti, H. S., Murwaningsari, E., & Umar, H. (2022) The Effect of Hexagon Fraud on Fraud Financial Statements with Governance and Culture as Moderating Variables. Jurnal Media Riset Akuntansi, Auditing & Informasi, vol. 22(1), pp. 143–156.

AICPA (2002) Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit, Statement on Auditing Standards No. 99, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, New York, NY.

Published
2023-09-26
How to Cite
Ivankov, V. (2023). THE INFLUENCE OF FORENSIC ECONOMIC EXPERTISE ON THE CHANGE OF THE AUDIT PARADIGM OF FRAUD ASSESSMENT. Change Management and Innovation, (7), 58-63. https://doi.org/10.32782/CMI/2023-7-8
Section
Accounting and taxation