REGLOBALIZATION VS DEGLOBALIZATION: TRANSFORMATION OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC RELATIONS IN CONDITIONS OF GEOPOLITICAL FRAGMENTATION

Keywords: globalization, deglobalization, reglobalization, geoeconomic fragmentation, reshoring, friendshoring, trade blocs, regionalization

Abstract

The article examines the transformation of global economic relations in the context of growing geopolitical polarization and increasing tensions between major economic powers. The discussion on deglobalization versus reglobalization of the world economy is comprehensively analyzed, drawing on recent empirical evidence and theoretical frameworks. It is established that instead of complete deglobalization, a structural transformation of globalization is taking place through regionalization of trade, reconfiguration of supply chains, and formation of distinct geoeconomic blocs aligned with geopolitical interests. The main drivers of fragmentation are identified and analyzed in detail: escalating trade wars between major economies, extensive use of economic sanctions as foreign policy instruments, production reshoring and nearshoring trends, and the growing role of national security considerations in trade policy formulation. The economic consequences of fragmentation for global GDP and international trade are assessed using quantitative models and empirical data, revealing significant but uneven impacts across different regions and sectors. The study reveals that current changes represent not the end of globalization but its restructuring into a new architecture with stronger regional ties, shorter and more resilient supply chains, and greater emphasis on geopolitical considerations in trade relationships. This emerging multipolar economic order is characterized by the formation of competing economic blocs, increased emphasis on economic sovereignty, and selective decoupling in strategic sectors such as technology, semiconductors, and critical raw materials. The research identifies key risks including reduced economic efficiency, higher costs for consumers and businesses, and potential for increased international conflicts. Simultaneously, it highlights opportunities for regional integration, development of alternative trade routes, and acceleration of technological innovation. Strategic approaches for national economies to adapt to these new conditions of geoeconomic fragmentation are proposed, emphasizing flexibility, diversification, and strategic partnerships.

References

Antràs P. De-Globalisation? Global Value Chains in the Post-COVID-19 Age. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, 2021. No. 28115. 38 p.

Asian Development Bank. Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership: Overview and Economic Impact. Manila: ADB, 2021. 64 p.

Baldwin R., Evenett S. J. COVID-19 and Trade Policy: Why Turning Inward Won’t Work. London: CEPR Press, 2020. 232 p.

Bown C. P., Kolb M. Trump’s Trade War Timeline: An Up-to-Date Guide. Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2023. URL: https://www.piie.com/blogs/trade-investment-policy-watch (дата звернення: 15.10.2025).

European Central Bank. The international role of the euro. Frankfurt: ECB, 2023. Annual Review. 84 p.

Freund C., Mattoo A., Mulabdic A., Ruta M. Is US Trade Policy Reshaping Global Supply Chains? World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 2023. No. 10511. 42 p.

Gopinath G. A New Bretton Woods Moment. IMF Blog, 2020. October 15. URL: https://www.imf.org/en/Blogs (дата звернення: 25.09.2025).

International Monetary Fund. The Economic Effects of Geopolitical Fragmentation. World Economic Outlook, 2023. Chapter 3. pp. 89-124.

McKinsey Global Institute. Risk, resilience, and rebalancing in global value chains. McKinsey & Company, 2020. 78 p. (дата звернення: 25.10.2025).

Rodrik D. Straight Talk on Trade: Ideas for a Sane World Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2017. 336 p.

Stiglitz J. E. Globalization and Its Discontents Revisited: Anti-Globalization in the Era of Trump. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2017. 512 p.

U.S. Department of Commerce. CHIPS for America. Washington: DOC, 2023. URL: https://www.commerce.gov/chips (дата звернення: 01.10.2025).

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. World Investment Report 2023: Investing in sustainable energy for all. Geneva: UNCTAD, 2023. 216 p.

World Trade Organization. World Trade Report 2023: Re-globalization for a secure, inclusive and sustainable future. Geneva: WTO, 2023. 248 p. (дата звернення: 25.10.2025)

World Economic Forum. Globalization 4.0: Shaping a New Global Architecture in the Age of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Geneva: WEF, 2019. 124 p.

World Bank. Global Economic Prospects: Weakening Growth, Financial Risks. Washington: World Bank Group, 2023. 224 p.

Antràs P. (2021) De-Globalisation? Global Value Chains in the Post-COVID-19 Age. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper. No. 28115. 38 p.

Asian Development Bank. Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership: Overview and Economic Impact. Manila: ADB, 2021. 64 p.

Baldwin R., Evenett S. J. (2020) COVID-19 and Trade Policy: Why Turning Inward Won’t Work. London: CEPR Press, 232 p.

Bown C. P., Kolb M. (2023) Trump’s Trade War Timeline: An Up-to-Date Guide. Peterson Institute for International Economics. Available at: https://www.piie.com/blogs/trade-investment-policy-watch (accessed October 15, 2025).

European Central Bank. (2023) The international role of the euro. Frankfurt: ECB. Annual Review. 84 p.

Freund C., Mattoo A., Mulabdic A., Ruta M. (2023) Is US Trade Policy Reshaping Global Supply Chains? World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 10511. 42 p.

Gopinath G. (2020) A New Bretton Woods Moment. IMF Blog. Available at: https://www.imf.org/en/Blogs (accessed September 25, 2025).

International Monetary Fund. (2023) The Economic Effects of Geopolitical Fragmentation. World Economic Outlook. Chapter 3. pp. 89-124.

McKinsey Global Institute. (2020) Risk, resilience, and rebalancing in global value chains. McKinsey & Company. 78 p. (accessed October 25, 2025).

Rodrik D. (2017) Straight Talk on Trade: Ideas for a Sane World Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 336 p.

Stiglitz J. E. (2017) Globalization and Its Discontents Revisited: Anti-Globalization in the Era of Trump. New York: W.W. Norton & Company. 512 p.

U.S. Department of Commerce. (2023) CHIPS for America. Washington: DOC. Available at: https://www.commerce.gov/chips (accessed October 1, 2025).

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2023) World Investment Report 2023: Investing in sustainable energy for all. Geneva: UNCTAD. 216 p.

World Trade Organization. (2023) World Trade Report 2023: Re-globalization for a secure, inclusive and sustainable future. Geneva: WTO. 248 p.

World Economic Forum. (2019) Globalization 4.0: Shaping a New Global Architecture in the Age of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Geneva: WEF. 124 p.

World Bank. (2023) Global Economic Prospects: Weakening Growth, Financial Risks. Washington: World Bank Group, 224 p.

Published
2025-12-05
How to Cite
Mudra, Y. (2025). REGLOBALIZATION VS DEGLOBALIZATION: TRANSFORMATION OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC RELATIONS IN CONDITIONS OF GEOPOLITICAL FRAGMENTATION. Change Management and Innovation, (16), 137-140. https://doi.org/10.32782/CMI/2025-16-21
Section
International economic relations