METHODOLOGY FOR STUDYING ECONOMIC PROCESSES IN CONDITIONS OF UNCERTAINTY AND RISK
Abstract
This article examines the theoretical and methodological foundations for analyzing economic processes under conditions of uncertainty and risk. It is argued that the modern economic environment is characterized by high dynamism, instability, information asymmetry, structural breaks, and the intensifying impact of external shocks, which necessitates a reevaluation of traditional approaches to the scientific understanding of economic phenomena. It is demonstrated that the methodology for studying economic processes should be based on a combination of systemic, behavioral, institutional, and risk-oriented approaches. The essence of the categories “risk” and “uncertainty” has been clarified, and it has been determined that risk is amenable to partial assessment and modeling, whereas uncertainty reflects a broader spectrum of phenomena associated with insufficient information, the variability of future system states, and the impossibility of their complete formalization. It is determined that an effective methodological framework for research must be based on the principles of systematicity, comprehensiveness, dynamism, scenario-based analysis, probabilistic interpretation of results, and adaptability of research tools. It is noted that modern methodological tools should encompass general scientific methods, economic and statistical analysis, econometric modeling, the scenario approach, expert assessment, stress testing, sensitivity analysis, and digital analytical tools. The paper justifies the use of a combined methodology, which allows for accounting for the multifactorial nature of economic processes, identifying sources of instability, evaluating alternative development trajectories, and formulating scientifically grounded recommendations. Attention is focused on Ukrainian conditions, where economic processes unfold under the influence of martial law, regulatory volatility, logistical disruptions, external financial dependence, and accelerated digital transformation. It is concluded that the proposed methodological provisions form the scientific basis for improving the quality of economic research, the reliability of analytical conclusions, and the effectiveness of management decisions under conditions of risk and uncertainty.
References
Бабайлов В. К., Курденко О. В. Від ризик-менеджменту до ризик-економіки. Економіка та суспільство. 2022. № 46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2022-46-46
Захарова Н. Ю. Управління ризиками на підприємстві: сутність, підходи та методи. Бізнес Інформ. 2023. № 1. С. 203–209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2023-1-203-209
Балдинюк В. М. Ризик-менеджмент як інструмент управління діяльності суб’єктів господарювання. Економіка та суспільство. 2023. № 55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2023-55-39
Байдацький М. В. Аналіз наукових підходів до розуміння ризик-менеджменту логістичних систем. Бізнес Інформ. 2024. № 2. С. 265–271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2024-2-265-271
Разумова Г. В., Курносова О. І. Управління ризиками інвестиційної діяльності в умовах цифрової трансформації. Бізнес Інформ. 2024. № 3. С. 96–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2024-3-96-101
Duan Y., Fan X., Wang Y. Economic policy uncertainty and bank systemic risk: A cross-country analysis. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal. 2022. Vol. 75. Article 101828. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2022.101828
Lan S., Meng W. Impact of economic policy uncertainty on systemic risk of real enterprises: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters. 2024. Vol. 69, Part B. Article 106243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.106243
He Y., Li W., Tan X., Sun Y. Economic policy uncertainty, digital transformation, and bank systemic risk. International Review of Economics & Finance. 2025. Vol. 102. Article 104309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104309
Bessa G., Barbosa B. Integrating artificial intelligence into scenario analysis: A validated framework for strategic planning under economic uncertainty. Global Economics Research. 2025. Vol. 1, No. 2. Article 100007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecores.2025.100007
OECD. Framework on Management of Emerging Critical Risks. OECD Public Governance Policy Papers. 2024. URL: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2024/06/framework-on-management-of-emerging-critical-risks_7924458a/2f2eddd8-en.pdf
Hong G. H., Ke S. (Barry), Nguyen A. D. M. The Economic Impact of Fiscal Policy Uncertainty: Evidence from a New Cross-Country Database. IMF Working Paper WP/24/209. 2024. URL: https://www.imf.org/-/media/files/publications/wp/2024/english/wpiea2024209-print-pdf.pdf
Bianchi F., Kung H., Tirskikh M. The Origins and Effects of Macroeconomic Uncertainty. Quantitative Economics. 2023. Vol. 14, No. 3. P. 855–896. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3982/QE1979
Lu C., Yang M., Xia X. Economic policy uncertainty and default risk: Evidence from China. Economic Analysis and Policy. 2023. Vol. 79. P. 821–836. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2023.06.028
Шимко О. В., Демидюк С. М. Ризик-орієнтований підхід до управління підприємством сфери послуг. Бізнес Інформ. 2024. № 4. С. 267–274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2024-4-267-274
Babailov V. K., Kurdenko O. V. (2022) Vid ryzyk-menedzhmentu do ryzyk-ekonomiky [From risk management to risk economics]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo, no. 46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2022-46-46
Zakharova N. Yu. (2023) Upravlinnia ryzykamy na pidpryiemstvi: sutnist, pidkhody ta metody [Risk management at the enterprise: essence, approaches and methods]. Biznes Inform, no. 1, pp. 203–209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2023-1-203-209
Baldyniuk V. M. (2023) Ryzyk-menedzhment yak instrument upravlinnia diialnosti subiektiv hospodariuvannia [Risk management as a tool for managing the activities of business entities]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo, no. 55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2023-55-39
Baidatskyi M. V. (2024) Analiz naukovykh pidkhodiv do rozuminnia ryzyk-menedzhmentu lohistychnykh system [Analysis of scientific approaches to understanding risk management of logistics systems]. Biznes Inform, no. 2, pp. 265–271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2024-2-265-271
Razumova H. V., Kurnosova O. I. (2024) Upravlinnia ryzykamy investytsiinoi diialnosti v umovakh tsyfrovoi transformatsii [Risk management of investment activity in the conditions of digital transformation]. Biznes Inform, no. 3, pp. 96–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2024-3-96-101
Duan Y., Fan X., Wang Y. (2022) Economic policy uncertainty and bank systemic risk: A cross-country analysis. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, vol. 75, article 101828. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2022.101828
Lan S., Meng W. (2024) Impact of economic policy uncertainty on systemic risk of real enterprises: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, vol. 69, part B, article 106243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.106243
He Y., Li W., Tan X., Sun Y. (2025) Economic policy uncertainty, digital transformation, and bank systemic risk. International Review of Economics & Finance, vol. 102, article 104309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104309
Bessa G., Barbosa B. (2025) Integrating artificial intelligence into scenario analysis: A validated framework for strategic planning under economic uncertainty. Global Economics Research, vol. 1, no. 2, article 100007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecores.2025.100007
OECD (2024) Framework on Management of Emerging Critical Risks. OECD Public Governance Policy Papers. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2024/06/framework-on-management-of-emerging-critical-risks_7924458a/2f2eddd8-en.pdf
Hong G. H., Ke S. (Barry), Nguyen A. D. M. (2024) The Economic Impact of Fiscal Policy Uncertainty: Evidence from a New Cross-Country Database. IMF Working Paper, WP/24/209. Available at: https://www.imf.org/-/media/files/publications/wp/2024/english/wpiea2024209-print-pdf.pdf
Bianchi F., Kung H., Tirskikh M. (2023) The origins and effects of macroeconomic uncertainty. Quantitative Economics, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 855–896. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3982/QE1979
Lu C., Yang M., Xia X. (2023) Economic policy uncertainty and default risk: Evidence from China. Economic Analysis and Policy, vol. 79, pp. 821–836. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2023.06.028
Shymko O. V., Demydiuk S. M. (2024) Ryzyk-oriientovanyi pidkhid do upravlinnia pidpryiemstvom sfery posluh [Risk-oriented approach to enterprise management in the service sector]. Biznes Inform, no. 4, pp. 267–274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2024-4-267-274
Copyright (c) 2026 О.М. Варченко, І.М. Паска, Л.М. Сатир, О.О. Драган

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

